DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (DeepSeek) and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (Google) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.
Snapshot as of 27 October 2026
As of 27 October 2026, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#30 vs #34); Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is 1.6× cheaper per output token ($2.50/1M vs $3.96/1M); and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 ships open weights.
Evidence: 3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards · 3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.
Benchmark scores: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Public benchmark boards where DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has a published result
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: common questions
Is DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 better than Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 27 October 2026: #30 against #34. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
Is DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 cheaper than Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is cheaper on output tokens: $2.50/1M against $3.96/1M. Input tokens are $1.32/1M for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and $0.30/1M for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $4.62 for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 versus $1.85 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs 60.0% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.
Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
Both publish a 1M-token context window. OpenRouter catalogue or provider-endpoint declaration. Limits can vary by provider and prompt length; a model-wide maximum has not been independently verified.
Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
Arena coding: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 1505, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite 1502 — DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 leads.
Are DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite open-weight models?
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: Open weights. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: No linked weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence. A missing weight link does not identify every API or chat product that offers a model.
Where can I run DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
ModelCap currently lists 23 API providers for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and 2 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.
How current is this DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite comparison?
Every figure and ModelCap Index position comes from the same published snapshot dated 27 October 2026. Publication and page updates happen separately; use the snapshot date shown on the page.