Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Muse Wonder

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (DeepSeek) and Muse Wonder (Meta) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 12 October 2026

As of 12 October 2026, Muse Wonder holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#6 vs #28); DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is 10.1× cheaper per output token ($1.98/1M vs $20.00/1M); and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 if…

  • API cost matters — $1.98/1M output tokens against $20.00/1M, about 10.1× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.66/1M against $4.00/1M.
  • you want to self-host: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 ships open weights while Muse Wonder is no linked weights.
  • you want provider choice — 20 listed API providers against 1.

Choose Muse Wonder if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #6 against #28 (83.0 vs 76.1 points).
  • AA Intelligence Index is your yardstick — 52.4 against 36.0.
  • AA Humanity's Last Exam is your yardstick — 50.1% against 41.0%.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Muse Wonder was listed 12 October 2026, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 12 August 2026.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Muse Wonder: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Muse Wonder
FieldDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeekMuse WonderMeta
ModelCap Index position#28#6
Index score76.183.0
EvidenceMeasuredEstimated
Input price / 1M tokens$0.66$4.00
Output price / 1M tokens$1.98$20.00
Context window1M tokens1M tokens
Declared route output cap393K944K
API providers listed201
Weight accessOpen weightsNo linked weights
Input modalitiesTextText, Image, Video, File, Audio
First listed12 August 202612 October 2026
PublisherDeepSeekMeta

Evidence: 3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards · 1 reported rows against measured corpus ladders (69%); publisher-corpus-prior over 211 held-out anchors (31%); shrunk 0.2 up toward the measured corpus. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Muse Wonder

Public benchmark boards where DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Muse Wonder has a published result
BoardDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Muse WonderLeads
Arena textArena (LMArena)14651458–1471High—Only one result
Arena codingArena (LMArena)15061494–1517High—Only one result
ARC-AGI-2ARC Prize Foundation61.3%Max—Only one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis36.0Max52.4MaxMuse Wonder
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Artificial Analysis78.7%Max—Only one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis41.0%Max50.1%MaxMuse Wonder

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Muse Wonder: common questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 better than Muse Wonder?

Muse Wonder ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 12 October 2026: #6 against #28. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 cheaper than Muse Wonder?

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is cheaper on output tokens: $1.98/1M against $20.00/1M. Input tokens are $0.66/1M for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and $4.00/1M for Muse Wonder. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $2.31 for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 versus $18.00 for Muse Wonder. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 costs 87.2% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Muse Wonder?

Both publish a 1M-token context window. OpenRouter catalogue or provider-endpoint declaration. Limits can vary by provider and prompt length; a model-wide maximum has not been independently verified.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Muse Wonder?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Muse Wonder open-weight models?

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: Open weights. Muse Wonder: No linked weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence. A missing weight link does not identify every API or chat product that offers a model.

Where can I run DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Muse Wonder?

ModelCap currently lists 20 API providers for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and 1 for Muse Wonder, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Muse Wonder comparison?

Every figure and ModelCap Index position comes from the same published snapshot dated 12 October 2026. Publication and page updates happen separately; use the snapshot date shown on the page.

Explore further