Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs LongCat 2.0

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (DeepSeek) and LongCat 2.0 (Meituan) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 9 September 2026

As of 9 September 2026, LongCat 2.0 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#10 vs #20); and LongCat 2.0 is 1.4× cheaper per output token ($1.20/1M vs $1.74/1M).

Which should you choose?

Choose DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 if…

  • you want provider choice — 19 listed API providers against 1.
  • you want the more recently listed model — DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 was listed 12 August 2026, LongCat 2.0 20 July 2026.

Choose LongCat 2.0 if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #10 against #20 (79.0 vs 73.6 points).
  • API cost matters — $1.20/1M output tokens against $1.74/1M, about 1.4× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.30/1M against $0.579/1M.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs LongCat 2.0: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and LongCat 2.0
FieldDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeekLongCat 2.0Meituan
ModelCap Index position#20#10
Index score73.679.0
EvidenceMeasuredEstimated
Input price / 1M tokens$0.579$0.30
Output price / 1M tokens$1.74$1.20
Context window1M tokens1M tokens
Max output tokens393K262K
API providers listed191
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights
Input modalitiesTextText
First listed12 August 202620 July 2026
PublisherDeepSeekMeituan

Evidence: 4 public benchmark observations across 4 boards · global-corpus-prior over 182 held-out anchors (7%); launch card against 4 resolved peers on 6 rows (93%); no cross-lab optimism probe available; shrunk 2 toward the measured corpus. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs LongCat 2.0

Public benchmark boards where DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or LongCat 2.0 has a published result
BoardDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813LongCat 2.0Leads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)15051490–1519HighOnly one result
ARC-AGI-2ARC Prize Foundation61.3%MaxOnly one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis36.3intelligence-index:v4.3:maxOnly one result
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Artificial Analysis78.7%terminal-bench:2.1:terminus-2:e2b:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (max)":reasoning=trueOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis41.0%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (max)":reasoning=trueOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs LongCat 2.0: common questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 better than LongCat 2.0?

LongCat 2.0 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 9 September 2026: #10 against #20. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 cheaper than LongCat 2.0?

LongCat 2.0 is cheaper on output tokens: $1.20/1M against $1.74/1M. Input tokens are $0.579/1M for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and $0.30/1M for LongCat 2.0. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $2.03 for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 versus $1.20 for LongCat 2.0. LongCat 2.0 costs 40.8% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or LongCat 2.0?

Both publish a 1M-token context window.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or LongCat 2.0?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and LongCat 2.0 open-weight models?

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: Open weights. LongCat 2.0: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and LongCat 2.0?

ModelCap currently lists 19 API providers for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and 1 for LongCat 2.0, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs LongCat 2.0 comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 9 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further