DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (DeepSeek) and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (Google) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.
Snapshot as of 24 October 2026
As of 24 October 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#14 vs #31); DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is 6.1× cheaper per output token ($1.98/1M vs $12.00/1M); and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 ships open weights.
Evidence: 3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards · 3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.
Benchmark scores: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Public benchmark boards where DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has a published result
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: common questions
Is DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 better than Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 24 October 2026: #14 against #31. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
Is DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 cheaper than Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview?
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is cheaper on output tokens: $1.98/1M against $12.00/1M. Input tokens are $0.66/1M for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and $2.00/1M for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $2.31 for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 versus $10.00 for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 costs 76.9% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.
Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview?
Both publish a 1M-token context window. OpenRouter catalogue or provider-endpoint declaration. Limits can vary by provider and prompt length; a model-wide maximum has not been independently verified.
Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview?
Arena coding: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 1505, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 1522 — Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads. AA Terminal-Bench 2.1: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 78.7%, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 73.8% — DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 leads.
Are DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview open-weight models?
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: Open weights. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: No linked weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence. A missing weight link does not identify every API or chat product that offers a model.
Where can I run DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview?
ModelCap currently lists 21 API providers for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and 2 for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.
How current is this DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview comparison?
Every figure and ModelCap Index position comes from the same published snapshot dated 24 October 2026. Publication and page updates happen separately; use the snapshot date shown on the page.