Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniMax M3

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (DeepSeek) and MiniMax M3 (MiniMax) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 10 September 2026

As of 10 September 2026, MiniMax M3 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#37 vs #40); DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 2× cheaper per output token ($0.60/1M vs $1.20/1M); and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash if…

  • API cost matters — $0.60/1M output tokens against $1.20/1M, about 2× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.15/1M against $0.30/1M.
  • you want to self-host: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ships open weights while MiniMax M3 is restricted license.
  • you want the more recently listed model — DeepSeek V4.1 Flash was listed 10 September 2026, MiniMax M3 31 May 2026.

Choose MiniMax M3 if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #37 against #40 (65.8 vs 65.2 points).
  • you want provider choice — 12 listed API providers against 3.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniMax M3: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and MiniMax M3
FieldDeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeekMiniMax M3MiniMax
ModelCap Index position#40#37
Index score65.265.8
EvidenceEstimatedMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.15$0.30
Output price / 1M tokens$0.60$1.20
Context window1M tokens1M tokens
Max output tokens384K512K
API providers listed312
Weight accessOpen weightsRestricted license
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image, Video
First listed10 September 202631 May 2026
PublisherDeepSeekMiniMax

Evidence: publisher-corpus-prior over 185 held-out anchors (22%); opens from measured predecessor deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731 (78%); shrunk 2 toward the measured corpus · 4 public benchmark observations across 4 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniMax M3

Public benchmark boards where DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or MiniMax M3 has a published result
BoardDeepSeek V4.1 FlashMiniMax M3Leads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)14981491–1504Only one result
LMArena AgentLMArena-5.3%-6.2%–-4.3%Only one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis29.6intelligence-index:v4.3:reasoning-unspecifiedOnly one result
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Artificial Analysis65.2%terminal-bench:2.1:terminus-2:e2b:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="MiniMax-M3":reasoning=trueOnly one result
AA τ²-Bench TelecomArtificial Analysis88.9%tau2:telecom:dual-control:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="MiniMax-M3":reasoning=trueOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis39.0%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="MiniMax-M3":reasoning=trueOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniMax M3: common questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash better than MiniMax M3?

MiniMax M3 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 10 September 2026: #37 against #40. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash cheaper than MiniMax M3?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper on output tokens: $0.60/1M against $1.20/1M. Input tokens are $0.15/1M for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and $0.30/1M for MiniMax M3. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $0.60 for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash versus $1.20 for MiniMax M3. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs 50.0% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or MiniMax M3?

Both publish a 1M-token context window.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or MiniMax M3?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and MiniMax M3 open-weight models?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: Open weights. MiniMax M3: Restricted license. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and MiniMax M3?

ModelCap currently lists 3 API providers for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and 12 for MiniMax M3, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniMax M3 comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 10 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further