Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemma 4 26B A4B

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (DeepSeek) and Gemma 4 26B A4B (Google) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 10 September 2026

As of 10 September 2026, Gemma 4 26B A4B holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#39 vs #40); Gemma 4 26B A4B is 1.8× cheaper per output token ($0.34/1M vs $0.60/1M); and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash offers the longer context window (1M vs 262K tokens).

Which should you choose?

Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash if…

  • you need the longer context window — 1M tokens against 262K.
  • you want the more recently listed model — DeepSeek V4.1 Flash was listed 10 September 2026, Gemma 4 26B A4B 3 April 2026.

Choose Gemma 4 26B A4B if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #39 against #40 (65.2 vs 65.2 points).
  • API cost matters — $0.34/1M output tokens against $0.60/1M, about 1.8× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.07/1M against $0.15/1M.
  • you want provider choice — 9 listed API providers against 3.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemma 4 26B A4B: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Gemma 4 26B A4B
FieldDeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeekGemma 4 26B A4BGoogle
ModelCap Index position#40#39
Index score65.265.2
EvidenceEstimatedMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.15$0.07
Output price / 1M tokens$0.60$0.34
Context window1M tokens262K tokens
Max output tokens384K16K
API providers listed39
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights
Input modalitiesText, ImageImage, Text, Video
First listed10 September 20263 April 2026
PublisherDeepSeekGoogle

Evidence: publisher-corpus-prior over 185 held-out anchors (22%); opens from measured predecessor deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731 (78%); shrunk 2 toward the measured corpus · 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemma 4 26B A4B

Public benchmark boards where DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Gemma 4 26B A4B has a published result
BoardDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGemma 4 26B A4BLeads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)14811466–1496Only one result
AA τ²-Bench TelecomArtificial Analysis40.4%tau2:telecom:dual-control:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning)":reasoning=falseOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis11.5%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning)":reasoning=falseOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemma 4 26B A4B: common questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash better than Gemma 4 26B A4B?

Gemma 4 26B A4B ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 10 September 2026: #39 against #40. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash cheaper than Gemma 4 26B A4B?

Gemma 4 26B A4B is cheaper on output tokens: $0.34/1M against $0.60/1M. Input tokens are $0.15/1M for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and $0.07/1M for Gemma 4 26B A4B. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $0.60 for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash versus $0.31 for Gemma 4 26B A4B. Gemma 4 26B A4B costs 48.3% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Gemma 4 26B A4B?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has the larger context window: 1M tokens against 262K.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Gemma 4 26B A4B?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Gemma 4 26B A4B open-weight models?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: Open weights. Gemma 4 26B A4B: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Gemma 4 26B A4B?

ModelCap currently lists 3 API providers for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and 9 for Gemma 4 26B A4B, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemma 4 26B A4B comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 10 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further