Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Gemma 4 26B A4B vs MiMo-V2.5

Gemma 4 26B A4B (Google) and MiMo-V2.5 (Xiaomi) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 22 September 2026

As of 22 September 2026, Gemma 4 26B A4B holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#38 vs #43); MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper per output token ($0.28/1M vs $0.30/1M); and MiMo-V2.5 offers the longer context window (1M vs 262K tokens).

Which should you choose?

Choose Gemma 4 26B A4B if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #38 against #43 (70.2 vs 69.6 points).
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.09/1M against $0.14/1M.
  • you want provider choice — 12 listed API providers against 6.

Choose MiMo-V2.5 if…

  • API cost matters — $0.28/1M output tokens against $0.30/1M.
  • you need the longer context window — 1M tokens against 262K.
  • Arena coding is your yardstick — 1491 against 1481.
  • you want the more recently listed model — MiMo-V2.5 was listed 22 April 2026, Gemma 4 26B A4B 3 April 2026.

Gemma 4 26B A4B vs MiMo-V2.5: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Gemma 4 26B A4B and MiMo-V2.5
FieldGemma 4 26B A4BGoogleMiMo-V2.5Xiaomi
ModelCap Index position#38#43
Index score70.269.6
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.09$0.14
Output price / 1M tokens$0.30$0.28
Context window262K tokens1M tokens
Max output tokens236K131K
API providers listed126
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights
Input modalitiesImage, Text, VideoText, Audio, Image, Video
First listed3 April 202622 April 2026
PublisherGoogleXiaomi

Evidence: 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards · 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs MiMo-V2.5

Public benchmark boards where Gemma 4 26B A4B or MiMo-V2.5 has a published result
BoardGemma 4 26B A4BMiMo-V2.5Leads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)14811466–149614911484–1497MiMo-V2.5
AA τ²-Bench TelecomArtificial Analysis40.4%tau2:telecom:dual-control:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning)":reasoning=falseOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis11.5%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning)":reasoning=falseOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Gemma 4 26B A4B vs MiMo-V2.5: common questions

Is Gemma 4 26B A4B better than MiMo-V2.5?

Gemma 4 26B A4B ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 22 September 2026: #38 against #43. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Gemma 4 26B A4B cheaper than MiMo-V2.5?

MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper on output tokens: $0.28/1M against $0.30/1M. Input tokens are $0.09/1M for Gemma 4 26B A4B and $0.14/1M for MiMo-V2.5. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $0.33 for Gemma 4 26B A4B versus $0.42 for MiMo-V2.5. Gemma 4 26B A4B costs 21.4% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemma 4 26B A4B or MiMo-V2.5?

MiMo-V2.5 has the larger context window: 1M tokens against 262K.

Which is better for coding, Gemma 4 26B A4B or MiMo-V2.5?

Arena coding: Gemma 4 26B A4B 1481, MiMo-V2.5 1491 — MiMo-V2.5 leads.

Are Gemma 4 26B A4B and MiMo-V2.5 open-weight models?

Gemma 4 26B A4B: Open weights. MiMo-V2.5: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Gemma 4 26B A4B and MiMo-V2.5?

ModelCap currently lists 12 API providers for Gemma 4 26B A4B and 6 for MiMo-V2.5, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Gemma 4 26B A4B vs MiMo-V2.5 comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 22 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further