Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Muse Spark Open

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (DeepSeek) and Muse Spark Open (Meta) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 15 October 2026

As of 15 October 2026, Muse Spark Open holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#15 vs #24); DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 5.9× cheaper per output token ($0.72/1M vs $4.25/1M); and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash if…

  • API cost matters — $0.72/1M output tokens against $4.25/1M, about 5.9× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.011/1M against $1.25/1M.
  • you want to self-host: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ships open weights while Muse Spark Open is gated access.
  • you want provider choice — 30 listed API providers against 4.
  • AA Intelligence Index is your yardstick — 39.5 against 38.9.

Choose Muse Spark Open if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #15 against #24 (79.6 vs 77.1 points).
  • AA Humanity's Last Exam is your yardstick — 43.9% against 39.2%.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Muse Spark Open was listed 15 October 2026, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 10 September 2026.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Muse Spark Open: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Muse Spark Open
FieldDeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeekMuse Spark OpenMeta
ModelCap Index position#24#15
Index score77.179.6
EvidenceMeasuredEstimated
Input price / 1M tokens$0.011$1.25
Output price / 1M tokens$0.72$4.25
Context window1M tokens1M tokens
Declared route output cap944K944K
API providers listed304
Weight accessOpen weightsGated access
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image, Video, File, Audio
First listed10 September 202615 October 2026
PublisherDeepSeekMeta

Evidence: 5 public benchmark observations across 5 boards · publisher-corpus-prior over 213 held-out anchors (22%); launch card against 5 resolved peers on 11 rows (78%); exceeds every named peer on 3 of 11 rows; optimism haircut 0 from cross-lab-probe; shrunk 1 up toward the measured corpus. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Muse Spark Open

Public benchmark boards where DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Muse Spark Open has a published result
BoardDeepSeek V4.1 FlashMuse Spark OpenLeads
Arena textArena (LMArena)14751468–1481Max—Only one result
Arena codingArena (LMArena)15261515–1536Max—Only one result
LMArena AgentLMArena3.0%2.6%–3.3%Max—Only one result
ARC-AGI-2ARC Prize Foundation72.9%Max—Only one result
ARC-AGI-3ARC Prize Foundation0.9%Max—Only one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis39.5Max38.9X-HighDeepSeek V4.1 Flash
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Artificial Analysis—76.4%X-HighOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis39.2%Max43.9%X-HighMuse Spark Open

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Muse Spark Open: common questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash better than Muse Spark Open?

Muse Spark Open ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 15 October 2026: #15 against #24. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash cheaper than Muse Spark Open?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper on output tokens: $0.72/1M against $4.25/1M. Input tokens are $0.011/1M for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and $1.25/1M for Muse Spark Open. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $0.38 for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash versus $4.63 for Muse Spark Open. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs 91.7% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Muse Spark Open?

Both publish a 1M-token context window. OpenRouter catalogue or provider-endpoint declaration. Limits can vary by provider and prompt length; a model-wide maximum has not been independently verified.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Muse Spark Open?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Muse Spark Open open-weight models?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: Open weights. Muse Spark Open: Gated access. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence. A missing weight link does not identify every API or chat product that offers a model.

Where can I run DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Muse Spark Open?

ModelCap currently lists 30 API providers for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and 4 for Muse Spark Open, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Muse Spark Open comparison?

Every figure and ModelCap Index position comes from the same published snapshot dated 15 October 2026. Publication and page updates happen separately; use the snapshot date shown on the page.

Explore further