DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (DeepSeek) and GLM 5.3 (Z.ai) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.
Snapshot as of 12 September 2026
As of 12 September 2026, GLM 5.3 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#6 vs #16); DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 7.3× cheaper per output token ($0.60/1M vs $4.40/1M); GLM 5.3 offers the longer context window (1.3M vs 1M tokens); and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ships open weights.
Evidence: 1 public benchmark observation across 1 board · 4 public benchmark observations across 4 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.
Benchmark scores: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM 5.3
Public benchmark boards where DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or GLM 5.3 has a published result
GLM 5.3 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 12 September 2026: #6 against #16. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash cheaper than GLM 5.3?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper on output tokens: $0.60/1M against $4.40/1M. Input tokens are $0.15/1M for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and $1.40/1M for GLM 5.3. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $0.60 for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash versus $5.00 for GLM 5.3. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs 88.0% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.
Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or GLM 5.3?
GLM 5.3 has the larger context window: 1.3M tokens against 1M.
Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or GLM 5.3?
The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.
Are DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and GLM 5.3 open-weight models?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: Open weights. GLM 5.3: Restricted license. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.
Where can I run DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and GLM 5.3?
ModelCap currently lists 12 API providers for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and 25 for GLM 5.3, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.
How current is this DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM 5.3 comparison?
Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 12 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.