Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM 5.3

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (DeepSeek) and GLM 5.3 (Z.ai) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 12 September 2026

As of 12 September 2026, GLM 5.3 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#6 vs #16); DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 7.3× cheaper per output token ($0.60/1M vs $4.40/1M); GLM 5.3 offers the longer context window (1.3M vs 1M tokens); and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash if…

  • API cost matters — $0.60/1M output tokens against $4.40/1M, about 7.3× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.15/1M against $1.40/1M.
  • you want to self-host: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ships open weights while GLM 5.3 is restricted license.
  • you want the more recently listed model — DeepSeek V4.1 Flash was listed 10 September 2026, GLM 5.3 18 August 2026.

Choose GLM 5.3 if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #6 against #16 (81.5 vs 76.6 points).
  • you need the longer context window — 1.3M tokens against 1M.
  • you want provider choice — 25 listed API providers against 12.
  • AA Intelligence Index is your yardstick — 44.9 against 39.5.
  • AA Humanity's Last Exam is your yardstick — 42.3% against 39.2%.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM 5.3: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and GLM 5.3
FieldDeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeekGLM 5.3Z.ai
ModelCap Index position#16#6
Index score76.681.5
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.15$1.40
Output price / 1M tokens$0.60$4.40
Context window1M tokens1.3M tokens
Max output tokens384K944K
API providers listed1225
Weight accessOpen weightsRestricted license
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
First listed10 September 202618 August 2026
PublisherDeepSeekZ.ai

Evidence: 1 public benchmark observation across 1 board · 4 public benchmark observations across 4 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM 5.3

Public benchmark boards where DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or GLM 5.3 has a published result
BoardDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGLM 5.3Leads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)15261514–1537MaxOnly one result
LMArena AgentLMArena2.6%2.0%–3.3%MaxOnly one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis39.5intelligence-index:v4.3:max44.9intelligence-index:v4.3:maxGLM 5.3
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Artificial Analysis83.9%terminal-bench:2.1:terminus-2:e2b:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="GLM-5.3 (max)":reasoning=trueOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis39.2%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max)":reasoning=true42.3%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="GLM-5.3 (max)":reasoning=trueGLM 5.3
Terminal-Bench 4.0Terminal-Bench (Laude Institute)41.8%38.6%–45.1%Claude Code · MaxOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM 5.3: common questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash better than GLM 5.3?

GLM 5.3 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 12 September 2026: #6 against #16. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash cheaper than GLM 5.3?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper on output tokens: $0.60/1M against $4.40/1M. Input tokens are $0.15/1M for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and $1.40/1M for GLM 5.3. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $0.60 for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash versus $5.00 for GLM 5.3. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs 88.0% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or GLM 5.3?

GLM 5.3 has the larger context window: 1.3M tokens against 1M.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or GLM 5.3?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and GLM 5.3 open-weight models?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: Open weights. GLM 5.3: Restricted license. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and GLM 5.3?

ModelCap currently lists 12 API providers for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and 25 for GLM 5.3, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM 5.3 comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 12 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further