Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Ling 3.0 Flash

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (DeepSeek) and Ling 3.0 Flash (InclusionAI) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 15 September 2026

As of 15 September 2026, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#63 vs #68); Ling 3.0 Flash is 15.9× cheaper per output token ($0.063/1M vs $1.00/1M); and Ling 3.0 Flash offers the longer context window (262K vs 164K tokens).

Which should you choose?

Choose DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #63 against #68 (56.8 vs 55.1 points).
  • you want provider choice — 4 listed API providers against 2.

Choose Ling 3.0 Flash if…

  • API cost matters — $0.063/1M output tokens against $1.00/1M, about 15.9× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.021/1M against $0.27/1M.
  • you need the longer context window — 262K tokens against 164K.
  • AA Intelligence Index is your yardstick — 20.6 against 15.4.
  • AA Terminal-Bench 2.1 is your yardstick — 55.4% against 44.9%.
  • AA Humanity's Last Exam is your yardstick — 23.7% against 8.7%.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Ling 3.0 Flash was listed 23 July 2026, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus 22 September 2025.

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Ling 3.0 Flash: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Ling 3.0 Flash
FieldDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusDeepSeekLing 3.0 FlashInclusionAI
ModelCap Index position#63#68
Index score56.855.1
EvidenceMeasuredEstimated
Input price / 1M tokens$0.27$0.021
Output price / 1M tokens$1.00$0.063
Context window164K tokens262K tokens
Max output tokens33K33K
API providers listed42
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights
Input modalitiesTextText
First listed22 September 202523 July 2026
PublisherDeepSeekInclusionAI

Evidence: 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards · 4 reported rows against measured corpus ladders (48%); global-corpus-prior over 176 held-out anchors (52%); shrunk 2.8 toward the measured corpus. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Ling 3.0 Flash

Public benchmark boards where DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus or Ling 3.0 Flash has a published result
BoardDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusLing 3.0 FlashLeads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)14611438–1485ThinkingOnly one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis15.4intelligence-index:v4.3:reasoning-unspecified20.6intelligence-index:v4.3:reasoning-unspecifiedLing 3.0 Flash
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Artificial Analysis44.9%terminal-bench:2.1:terminus-2:e2b:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning)":reasoning=true55.4%terminal-bench:2.1:terminus-2:e2b:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="Ling 3.0 Flash":reasoning=trueLing 3.0 Flash
AA τ²-Bench TelecomArtificial Analysis37.1%tau2:telecom:dual-control:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Non-reasoning)":reasoning=falseOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis8.7%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Non-reasoning)":reasoning=false23.7%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Ling 3.0 Flash":reasoning=trueLing 3.0 Flash

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Ling 3.0 Flash: common questions

Is DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus better than Ling 3.0 Flash?

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 15 September 2026: #63 against #68. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus cheaper than Ling 3.0 Flash?

Ling 3.0 Flash is cheaper on output tokens: $0.063/1M against $1.00/1M. Input tokens are $0.27/1M for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and $0.021/1M for Ling 3.0 Flash. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $1.04 for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus versus $0.07 for Ling 3.0 Flash. Ling 3.0 Flash costs 92.9% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus or Ling 3.0 Flash?

Ling 3.0 Flash has the larger context window: 262K tokens against 164K.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus or Ling 3.0 Flash?

AA Terminal-Bench 2.1: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus 44.9%, Ling 3.0 Flash 55.4% — Ling 3.0 Flash leads.

Are DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Ling 3.0 Flash open-weight models?

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus: Open weights. Ling 3.0 Flash: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Ling 3.0 Flash?

ModelCap currently lists 4 API providers for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and 2 for Ling 3.0 Flash, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Ling 3.0 Flash comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 15 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further