Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Ling-3.0-flash

Claude Haiku 4.5 (Anthropic) and Ling-3.0-flash (InclusionAI) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 17 August 2026

As of 17 August 2026, Ling-3.0-flash holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#42 vs #45); Ling-3.0-flash is 79.4× cheaper per output token ($0.063/1M vs $5.00/1M); Ling-3.0-flash offers the longer context window (262K vs 200K tokens); and Ling-3.0-flash ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 if…

  • you want provider choice — 4 listed API providers against 2.

Choose Ling-3.0-flash if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #42 against #45 (53.0 vs 52.3 points).
  • API cost matters — $0.063/1M output tokens against $5.00/1M, about 79.4× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.021/1M against $1.00/1M.
  • you need the longer context window — 262K tokens against 200K.
  • you want to self-host: Ling-3.0-flash ships open weights while Claude Haiku 4.5 is api only.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Ling-3.0-flash was listed 23 July 2026, Claude Haiku 4.5 15 October 2025.

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Ling-3.0-flash: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Claude Haiku 4.5 and Ling-3.0-flash
FieldClaude Haiku 4.5AnthropicLing-3.0-flashInclusionAI
ModelCap Index position#45#42
Index score52.353.0
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$1.00$0.021
Output price / 1M tokens$5.00$0.063
Context window200K tokens262K tokens
Max output tokens64K33K
API providers listed42
Weight accessAPI onlyOpen weights
Input modalitiesText, Image, FileText
First listed15 October 202523 July 2026
PublisherAnthropicInclusionAI

Evidence: 3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards · 1 public benchmark observation across 1 board. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Ling-3.0-flash

Public benchmark boards where Claude Haiku 4.5 or Ling-3.0-flash has a published result
BoardClaude Haiku 4.5Ling-3.0-flashLeads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)14791475–1484Only one result
ARC-AGI-2ARC Prize Foundation4.0%ThinkingOnly one result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis37.8intelligence-indexOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Ling-3.0-flash: common questions

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 better than Ling-3.0-flash?

Ling-3.0-flash ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 17 August 2026: #42 against #45. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it.

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 cheaper than Ling-3.0-flash?

Ling-3.0-flash is cheaper on output tokens: $0.063/1M against $5.00/1M. Input tokens are $1.00/1M for Claude Haiku 4.5 and $0.021/1M for Ling-3.0-flash. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Ling-3.0-flash?

Ling-3.0-flash has the larger context window: 262K tokens against 200K.

Which is better for coding, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Ling-3.0-flash?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Claude Haiku 4.5 and Ling-3.0-flash open-weight models?

Claude Haiku 4.5: API only. Ling-3.0-flash: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Claude Haiku 4.5 and Ling-3.0-flash?

ModelCap currently lists 4 API providers for Claude Haiku 4.5 and 2 for Ling-3.0-flash, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Ling-3.0-flash comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 17 August 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further