Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

R1 0528 vs Xing4.0 29B A4B

R1 0528 (DeepSeek) and Xing4.0 29B A4B (XingChen AGI) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 17 September 2026

As of 17 September 2026, R1 0528 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#58 vs #60).

Which should you choose?

Choose R1 0528 if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #58 against #60 (58.2 vs 57.8 points).
  • you want provider choice — 4 listed API providers against 0.

Choose Xing4.0 29B A4B if…

  • you want the more recently listed model — Xing4.0 29B A4B was listed 16 September 2026, R1 0528 28 May 2025.

R1 0528 vs Xing4.0 29B A4B: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of R1 0528 and Xing4.0 29B A4B
FieldR1 0528DeepSeekXing4.0 29B A4BXingChen AGI
ModelCap Index position#58#60
Index score58.257.8
EvidenceMeasuredEstimated
Input price / 1M tokens$0.50Unlisted
Output price / 1M tokens$2.15Unlisted
Context window164K tokens— tokens
Max output tokens33K
API providers listed40
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights
Input modalitiesTextText
First listed28 May 202516 September 2026
PublisherDeepSeekXingChen AGI

Evidence: 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards · global-corpus-prior over 197 held-out anchors (16%); launch card against 2 resolved peers on 5 rows (85%); exceeds every named peer on 1 of 5 rows; optimism haircut 0 from cross-lab-probe; shrunk 1.2 toward the measured corpus. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: R1 0528 vs Xing4.0 29B A4B

Public benchmark boards where R1 0528 or Xing4.0 29B A4B has a published result
BoardR1 0528Xing4.0 29B A4BLeads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)14641453–1475Only one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

R1 0528 vs Xing4.0 29B A4B: common questions

Is R1 0528 better than Xing4.0 29B A4B?

R1 0528 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 17 September 2026: #58 against #60. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is R1 0528 cheaper than Xing4.0 29B A4B?

At least one of the two has no listed API price on ModelCap right now, so no price comparison is made.

Which has the bigger context window, R1 0528 or Xing4.0 29B A4B?

Both publish a 164K-token context window.

Which is better for coding, R1 0528 or Xing4.0 29B A4B?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are R1 0528 and Xing4.0 29B A4B open-weight models?

R1 0528: Open weights. Xing4.0 29B A4B: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run R1 0528 and Xing4.0 29B A4B?

ModelCap currently lists 4 API providers for R1 0528 and 0 for Xing4.0 29B A4B, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this R1 0528 vs Xing4.0 29B A4B comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 17 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further