Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

R1 0528 vs Kimi K2.7 Code

R1 0528 (DeepSeek) and Kimi K2.7 Code (Moonshot AI) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 15 September 2026

As of 15 September 2026, Kimi K2.7 Code holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#55 vs #58); R1 0528 is 1.6× cheaper per output token ($2.15/1M vs $3.50/1M); Kimi K2.7 Code offers the longer context window (262K vs 164K tokens); and R1 0528 ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose R1 0528 if…

  • API cost matters — $2.15/1M output tokens against $3.50/1M, about 1.6× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.50/1M against $0.71/1M.
  • you want to self-host: R1 0528 ships open weights while Kimi K2.7 Code is restricted license.

Choose Kimi K2.7 Code if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #55 against #58 (58.5 vs 57.8 points).
  • you need the longer context window — 262K tokens against 164K.
  • you want provider choice — 14 listed API providers against 4.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Kimi K2.7 Code was listed 12 June 2026, R1 0528 28 May 2025.

R1 0528 vs Kimi K2.7 Code: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of R1 0528 and Kimi K2.7 Code
FieldR1 0528DeepSeekKimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AI
ModelCap Index position#58#55
Index score57.858.5
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.50$0.71
Output price / 1M tokens$2.15$3.50
Context window164K tokens262K tokens
Max output tokens33K236K
API providers listed414
Weight accessOpen weightsRestricted license
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
First listed28 May 202512 June 2026
PublisherDeepSeekMoonshot AI

Evidence: 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards · 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: R1 0528 vs Kimi K2.7 Code

Public benchmark boards where R1 0528 or Kimi K2.7 Code has a published result
BoardR1 0528Kimi K2.7 CodeLeads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)14641453–1475Only one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis26.3intelligence-index:v4.3:reasoning-unspecifiedOnly one result
AA τ²-Bench TelecomArtificial Analysis90.1%tau2:telecom:dual-control:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="Kimi K2.7 Code":reasoning=trueOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis35.0%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Kimi K2.7 Code":reasoning=trueOnly one result
WildClawBench OpenClawWildClawBench46.9Only one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

R1 0528 vs Kimi K2.7 Code: common questions

Is R1 0528 better than Kimi K2.7 Code?

Kimi K2.7 Code ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 15 September 2026: #55 against #58. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is R1 0528 cheaper than Kimi K2.7 Code?

R1 0528 is cheaper on output tokens: $2.15/1M against $3.50/1M. Input tokens are $0.50/1M for R1 0528 and $0.71/1M for Kimi K2.7 Code. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $2.08 for R1 0528 versus $3.17 for Kimi K2.7 Code. R1 0528 costs 34.5% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, R1 0528 or Kimi K2.7 Code?

Kimi K2.7 Code has the larger context window: 262K tokens against 164K.

Which is better for coding, R1 0528 or Kimi K2.7 Code?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are R1 0528 and Kimi K2.7 Code open-weight models?

R1 0528: Open weights. Kimi K2.7 Code: Restricted license. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run R1 0528 and Kimi K2.7 Code?

ModelCap currently lists 4 API providers for R1 0528 and 14 for Kimi K2.7 Code, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this R1 0528 vs Kimi K2.7 Code comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 15 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further