Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GLM 5.3

Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic) and GLM 5.3 (Z.ai) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 22 September 2026

As of 22 September 2026, Claude Opus 5.5 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#1 vs #11); GLM 5.3 is 9.7× cheaper per output token ($2.05/1M vs $20.00/1M); and GLM 5.3 offers the longer context window (1.3M vs 1M tokens).

Which should you choose?

Choose Claude Opus 5.5 if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #1 against #11 (98.6 vs 84.2 points).
  • AA Intelligence Index is your yardstick — 57.6 against 44.8.
  • AA Humanity's Last Exam is your yardstick — 61.4% against 42.3%.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Claude Opus 5.5 was listed 22 September 2026, GLM 5.3 18 August 2026.

Choose GLM 5.3 if…

  • API cost matters — $2.05/1M output tokens against $20.00/1M, about 9.7× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.654/1M against $4.00/1M.
  • you need the longer context window — 1.3M tokens against 1M.
  • you want provider choice — 30 listed API providers against 5.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GLM 5.3: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Claude Opus 5.5 and GLM 5.3
FieldClaude Opus 5.5AnthropicGLM 5.3Z.ai
ModelCap Index position#1#11
Index score98.684.2
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$4.00$0.654
Output price / 1M tokens$20.00$2.05
Context window1M tokens1.3M tokens
Max output tokens128K131K
API providers listed530
Weight accessAPI onlyRestricted license
Input modalitiesText, Image, FileText
First listed22 September 202618 August 2026
PublisherAnthropicZ.ai

Evidence: 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards · 4 public benchmark observations across 4 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Claude Opus 5.5 vs GLM 5.3

Public benchmark boards where Claude Opus 5.5 or GLM 5.3 has a published result
BoardClaude Opus 5.5GLM 5.3Leads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)15241512–1536MaxOnly one result
LMArena AgentLMArena3.1%2.4%–3.7%MaxOnly one result
ARC-AGI-2ARC Prize Foundation93.3%HighOnly one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis57.6intelligence-index:v4.3:reasoning-unspecified44.8intelligence-index:v4.3:maxClaude Opus 5.5
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis61.4%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Claude Opus 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback)":reasoning=true42.3%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="GLM-5.3 (max)":reasoning=trueClaude Opus 5.5
Terminal-Bench 4.0Terminal-Bench (Laude Institute)41.8%38.6%–45.1%Claude Code · MaxOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GLM 5.3: common questions

Is Claude Opus 5.5 better than GLM 5.3?

Claude Opus 5.5 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 22 September 2026: #1 against #11. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Claude Opus 5.5 cheaper than GLM 5.3?

GLM 5.3 is cheaper on output tokens: $2.05/1M against $20.00/1M. Input tokens are $4.00/1M for Claude Opus 5.5 and $0.654/1M for GLM 5.3. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $18.00 for Claude Opus 5.5 versus $2.33 for GLM 5.3. GLM 5.3 costs 87.0% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Opus 5.5 or GLM 5.3?

GLM 5.3 has the larger context window: 1.3M tokens against 1M.

Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 5.5 or GLM 5.3?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Claude Opus 5.5 and GLM 5.3 open-weight models?

Claude Opus 5.5: API only. GLM 5.3: Restricted license. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Claude Opus 5.5 and GLM 5.3?

ModelCap currently lists 5 API providers for Claude Opus 5.5 and 30 for GLM 5.3, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Claude Opus 5.5 vs GLM 5.3 comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 22 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further