Claude Haiku 5.5 (Anthropic) and Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.
Snapshot as of 14 October 2026
As of 14 October 2026, Claude Opus 5.5 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#3 vs #59); and Claude Haiku 5.5 is 40× cheaper per output token ($0.50/1M vs $20.00/1M).
Evidence: 1 reported rows against measured corpus ladders (24%); publisher-corpus-prior over 213 held-out anchors (14%); measured predecessor anthropic/claude-haiku-4.5 less the succession penalty (51%); 1 specialist-board observation at 2.5% support (11%); shrunk 2.3 up toward the measured corpus · 4 public benchmark observations across 4 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.
Benchmark scores: Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Claude Opus 5.5
Public benchmark boards where Claude Haiku 5.5 or Claude Opus 5.5 has a published result
Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Claude Opus 5.5: common questions
Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than Claude Opus 5.5?
Claude Opus 5.5 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 14 October 2026: #3 against #59. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals do not overlap, but the aggregate Index does not predict performance on every task; compare the relevant benchmark configurations before choosing.
Is Claude Haiku 5.5 cheaper than Claude Opus 5.5?
Claude Haiku 5.5 is cheaper on output tokens: $0.50/1M against $20.00/1M. Input tokens are $0.10/1M for Claude Haiku 5.5 and $4.00/1M for Claude Opus 5.5. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $0.45 for Claude Haiku 5.5 versus $18.00 for Claude Opus 5.5. Claude Haiku 5.5 costs 97.5% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.
Which has the bigger context window, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Claude Opus 5.5?
Both publish a 1M-token context window. OpenRouter catalogue or provider-endpoint declaration. Limits can vary by provider and prompt length; a model-wide maximum has not been independently verified.
Which is better for coding, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Claude Opus 5.5?
The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.
Are Claude Haiku 5.5 and Claude Opus 5.5 open-weight models?
Claude Haiku 5.5: No linked weights. Claude Opus 5.5: No linked weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence. A missing weight link does not identify every API or chat product that offers a model.
Where can I run Claude Haiku 5.5 and Claude Opus 5.5?
ModelCap currently lists 5 API providers for Claude Haiku 5.5 and 5 for Claude Opus 5.5, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.
How current is this Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Claude Opus 5.5 comparison?
Every figure and ModelCap Index position comes from the same published snapshot dated 14 October 2026. Publication and page updates happen separately; use the snapshot date shown on the page.