Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Hy-MT2-7B and GLM 4.5 Air, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Hy-MT2-7B vs GLM 4.5 Air

Live dataset updated 9/3/2026, 3:51:17 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Hy-MT2-7B and GLM 4.5 Air
Field
Hy-MT2-7B

Tencent

ModelCap position#74#76
Index score38.937.0
EvidenceEstimatedpublisher corpus prior · leave-one-anchor-out calibratedMeasured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards
Input / 1M$0.074$0.13
Output / 1M$0.295$0.85
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context8K131K
Providers13
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Hy-MT2-7B is #74; GLM 4.5 Air is #76 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 38.9 for Hy-MT2-7B and 37.0 for GLM 4.5 Air.
  • Evidence differs: Hy-MT2-7B is Estimated; GLM 4.5 Air is Measured.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $0.29 for Hy-MT2-7B and $0.85 for GLM 4.5 Air.
  • Published context is 8,192 tokens for Hy-MT2-7B and 131,072 for GLM 4.5 Air.
  • ModelCap currently lists 1 providers for Hy-MT2-7B and 3 for GLM 4.5 Air.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.