Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Hy-MT2-30B-A3B and GLM 4.5 Air, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Hy-MT2-30B-A3B vs GLM 4.5 Air

Live dataset updated 9/3/2026, 4:08:40 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Hy-MT2-30B-A3B and GLM 4.5 Air
Field
ModelCap position#73#76
Index score38.937.0
EvidenceEstimatedpublisher corpus prior · leave-one-anchor-out calibratedMeasured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards
Input / 1M$0.074$0.13
Output / 1M$0.295$0.85
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context8K131K
Providers13
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Hy-MT2-30B-A3B is #73; GLM 4.5 Air is #76 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 38.9 for Hy-MT2-30B-A3B and 37.0 for GLM 4.5 Air.
  • Evidence differs: Hy-MT2-30B-A3B is Estimated; GLM 4.5 Air is Measured.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $0.29 for Hy-MT2-30B-A3B and $0.85 for GLM 4.5 Air.
  • Published context is 8,192 tokens for Hy-MT2-30B-A3B and 131,072 for GLM 4.5 Air.
  • ModelCap currently lists 1 providers for Hy-MT2-30B-A3B and 3 for GLM 4.5 Air.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.