Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with ContextPilot E4B and GLM 4.5 Air, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

ContextPilot E4B vs GLM 4.5 Air

Live dataset updated 9/13/2026, 2:40:29 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of ContextPilot E4B and GLM 4.5 Air
Field
ModelCap position#106#103
Index score41.342.0
EvidenceInheritedfinetune of google/gemma-4-E4B-it · finetune (100%)Measured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards
Input / 1MUnavailable$0.13
Output / 1MUnavailable$0.85
Pricing statusunavailablefresh
Context—131K
Providers03
Weight accessRestricted licenseOpen weights

Decision facts

  • ContextPilot E4B is #106; GLM 4.5 Air is #103 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 41.3 for ContextPilot E4B and 42.0 for GLM 4.5 Air. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
  • Evidence differs: ContextPilot E4B is Inherited; GLM 4.5 Air is Measured.
  • Weight access differs: ContextPilot E4B is restricted; GLM 4.5 Air is open.
  • ModelCap currently lists 0 providers for ContextPilot E4B and 3 for GLM 4.5 Air.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.