Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with ContextPilot E4B and Hy-MT2-7B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

ContextPilot E4B vs Hy-MT2-7B

Live dataset updated 9/3/2026, 3:39:57 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of ContextPilot E4B and Hy-MT2-7B
Field
Hy-MT2-7B

Tencent

ModelCap position#71#74
Index score38.938.9
EvidenceEstimatedpublisher corpus prior · leave-one-anchor-out calibratedEstimatedpublisher corpus prior · leave-one-anchor-out calibrated
Input / 1MUnavailable$0.074
Output / 1MUnavailable$0.295
Pricing statusunavailablefresh
Context—8K
Providers01
Weight accessRestricted licenseOpen weights

Decision facts

  • ContextPilot E4B is #71; Hy-MT2-7B is #74 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 38.9 for ContextPilot E4B and 38.9 for Hy-MT2-7B.
  • Both positions use Estimated evidence.
  • Weight access differs: ContextPilot E4B is restricted; Hy-MT2-7B is open.
  • ModelCap currently lists 0 providers for ContextPilot E4B and 1 for Hy-MT2-7B.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.