Model decision surface
Compare AI models
Start with Step 3.7 Flash and GLM 5 Turbo, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.
Current public data
Step 3.7 Flash vs GLM 5 Turbo
Live dataset updated 9/22/2026, 10:37:09 PM UTC
Open 1200×630 evidence receipt| Field | Step 3.7 Flash StepFun | GLM 5 Turbo Z.ai |
|---|---|---|
| ModelCap position | #96 | #93 |
| Index score | 54.2 | 54.4 |
| Evidence | Estimated3 reported rows against measured corpus ladders (20%); global-corpus-prior over 209 held-out anchors (17%); measured predecessor stepfun/step-3.5-flash less the succession penalty (63%); shrunk 0.6 up toward the measured corpus | Measuredpublisher-corpus-prior over 209 held-out anchors (63%); 1 specialist-board observation at 1.2% support (37%); shrunk 24.5 up toward the measured corpus |
| Input / 1M | $0.20 | $1.20 |
| Output / 1M | $1.15 | $4.00 |
| Pricing status | fresh | fresh |
| Context | 262K | 203K |
| Providers | 3 | 1 |
| Weight access | Open weights | API only |
Decision facts
- Step 3.7 Flash is #96; GLM 5 Turbo is #93 on the same current language board.
- Index scores are 54.2 for Step 3.7 Flash and 54.4 for GLM 5 Turbo. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
- Evidence differs: Step 3.7 Flash is Estimated; GLM 5 Turbo is Measured.
- Listed output price per 1M tokens is $1.15 for Step 3.7 Flash and $4.00 for GLM 5 Turbo. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $0.97 for Step 3.7 Flash versus $4.40 for GLM 5 Turbo. Step 3.7 Flash costs 77.8% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.
- Published context is 262,144 tokens for Step 3.7 Flash and 202,752 for GLM 5 Turbo.
- Weight access differs: Step 3.7 Flash is open; GLM 5 Turbo is none.
- ModelCap currently lists 3 providers for Step 3.7 Flash and 1 for GLM 5 Turbo.
These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.
Popular comparisons
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol#1 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5.5#3 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Sol#3 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Grok 4.7#1 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Sol vs Grok 4.7#2 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Grok 4.7#3 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#1 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Sol vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#2 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#3 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Grok 4.7 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#4 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#1 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#2 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#3 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Grok 4.7#6 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#6 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra#1 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs GPT-6 Sol#7 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra#3 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs Grok 4.7#7 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#7 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#7 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3#1 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6 Sol#8 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3#3 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.