Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Step 3.7 Flash and GLM 4.7 Flash, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

First modelSecond model

Current public data

Step 3.7 Flash vs GLM 4.7 Flash

Live dataset updated 8/18/2026, 12:08:12 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt

Factual comparison of Step 3.7 Flash and GLM 4.7 Flash
Field	Step 3.7 Flash StepFun	GLM 4.7 Flash Z.ai
ModelCap position	#65	#66
Index score	39.6	38.0
Evidence	Measured1 public benchmark observation across 1 board	Measured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards
Input / 1M	$0.20	$0.06
Output / 1M	$1.15	$0.40
Pricing status	fresh	fresh
Context	262K	203K
Providers	3	4
Weight access	Open weights	Open weights

Decision facts

Step 3.7 Flash is #65; GLM 4.7 Flash is #66 on the same current language board.
Index scores are 39.6 for Step 3.7 Flash and 38.0 for GLM 4.7 Flash.
Both positions use Measured evidence.
Listed output price per 1M tokens is $1.15 for Step 3.7 Flash and $0.40 for GLM 4.7 Flash.
Published context is 262,144 tokens for Step 3.7 Flash and 202,752 for GLM 4.7 Flash.
ModelCap currently lists 3 providers for Step 3.7 Flash and 4 for GLM 4.7 Flash.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Popular comparisons

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.