Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Step 3.7 Flash and Hy-MT2-7B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Step 3.7 Flash vs Hy-MT2-7B

Live dataset updated 9/3/2026, 3:39:57 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Step 3.7 Flash and Hy-MT2-7B
Field
Hy-MT2-7B

Tencent

ModelCap position#75#74
Index score38.238.9
EvidenceMeasured1 public benchmark observation across 1 boardEstimatedpublisher corpus prior · leave-one-anchor-out calibrated
Input / 1M$0.20$0.074
Output / 1M$1.15$0.295
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context262K8K
Providers31
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Step 3.7 Flash is #75; Hy-MT2-7B is #74 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 38.2 for Step 3.7 Flash and 38.9 for Hy-MT2-7B.
  • Evidence differs: Step 3.7 Flash is Measured; Hy-MT2-7B is Estimated.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $1.15 for Step 3.7 Flash and $0.29 for Hy-MT2-7B.
  • Published context is 262,144 tokens for Step 3.7 Flash and 8,192 for Hy-MT2-7B.
  • ModelCap currently lists 3 providers for Step 3.7 Flash and 1 for Hy-MT2-7B.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.