Model decision surface
Compare AI models
Start with Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct and Step 3.7 Flash, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.
Current public data
Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct vs Step 3.7 Flash
Live dataset updated 9/12/2026, 1:09:54 PM UTC
Open 1200×630 evidence receipt| Field | Step 3.7 Flash StepFun | |
|---|---|---|
| ModelCap position | #95 | #94 |
| Index score | 47.5 | 48.0 |
| Evidence | Estimatedpublisher-corpus-prior over 188 held-out anchors (10%); launch card against 4 resolved peers on 4 rows (90%); exceeds every named peer on 1 of 4 rows; no cross-lab optimism probe available; shrunk 0.3 up toward the measured corpus | Estimated3 reported rows against measured corpus ladders (15%); global-corpus-prior over 188 held-out anchors (19%); measured predecessor stepfun/step-3.5-flash less the succession penalty (66%); shrunk 1.2 up toward the measured corpus |
| Input / 1M | Unavailable | $0.20 |
| Output / 1M | Unavailable | $1.15 |
| Pricing status | unavailable | fresh |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Providers | 0 | 3 |
| Weight access | Restricted license | Open weights |
Decision facts
- Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct is #95; Step 3.7 Flash is #94 on the same current language board.
- Index scores are 47.5 for Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct and 48.0 for Step 3.7 Flash. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
- Both positions use Estimated evidence.
- Weight access differs: Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct is restricted; Step 3.7 Flash is open.
- ModelCap currently lists 0 providers for Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct and 3 for Step 3.7 Flash.
These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.
Popular comparisons
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3#1 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5#1 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Muse Spark 1.3#3 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra#1 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6 Astra#2 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-6 Astra#3 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#1 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#2 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#3 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-6 Astra#5 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GLM 5.3#1 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GLM 5.3#2 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GLM 5.3#3 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs GLM 5.3#4 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs GLM 5.3#5 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#1 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3#7 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#3 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra#7 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Sol#7 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GLM 5.3#7 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3#1 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs Kimi K3#2 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Kimi K3#3 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.