Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking and GLM 4.6V, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs GLM 4.6V

Live dataset updated 8/18/2026, 3:36:20 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking and GLM 4.6V
Field
ModelCap position#68#77
Index score37.533.2
EvidenceMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boardsMeasured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards
Input / 1M$0.15$0.30
Output / 1M$1.20$0.90
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context262K131K
Providers32
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is #68; GLM 4.6V is #77 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 37.5 for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking and 33.2 for GLM 4.6V.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $1.20 for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking and $0.90 for GLM 4.6V.
  • Published context is 262,144 tokens for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking and 131,072 for GLM 4.6V.
  • ModelCap currently lists 3 providers for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking and 2 for GLM 4.6V.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.