Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking and ContextPilot E4B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs ContextPilot E4B

Live dataset updated 9/13/2026, 2:40:29 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking and ContextPilot E4B
Field
ModelCap position#108#106
Index score40.641.3
EvidenceMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boardsInheritedfinetune of google/gemma-4-E4B-it · finetune (100%)
Input / 1M$0.15Unavailable
Output / 1M$1.20Unavailable
Pricing statusfreshunavailable
Context262K—
Providers20
Weight accessOpen weightsRestricted license

Decision facts

  • Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is #108; ContextPilot E4B is #106 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 40.6 for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking and 41.3 for ContextPilot E4B. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
  • Evidence differs: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is Measured; ContextPilot E4B is Inherited.
  • Weight access differs: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is open; ContextPilot E4B is restricted.
  • ModelCap currently lists 2 providers for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking and 0 for ContextPilot E4B.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.