Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Qwen3 Max Thinking and GLM 4.5 Air, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Qwen3 Max Thinking vs GLM 4.5 Air

Live dataset updated 8/18/2026, 3:36:20 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Qwen3 Max Thinking and GLM 4.5 Air
Field
ModelCap position#56#69
Index score44.536.9
EvidenceMeasured1 public benchmark observation across 1 boardMeasured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards
Input / 1M$0.78$0.13
Output / 1M$3.90$0.85
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context262K131K
Providers13
Weight accessAPI onlyOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Qwen3 Max Thinking is #56; GLM 4.5 Air is #69 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 44.5 for Qwen3 Max Thinking and 36.9 for GLM 4.5 Air.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $3.90 for Qwen3 Max Thinking and $0.85 for GLM 4.5 Air.
  • Published context is 262,144 tokens for Qwen3 Max Thinking and 131,072 for GLM 4.5 Air.
  • Weight access differs: Qwen3 Max Thinking is none; GLM 4.5 Air is open.
  • ModelCap currently lists 1 providers for Qwen3 Max Thinking and 3 for GLM 4.5 Air.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.