Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Qwen3 Coder Next and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Qwen3 Coder Next vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking

Live dataset updated 8/17/2026, 11:13:20 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Qwen3 Coder Next and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Field
ModelCap position#85#68
Index score27.637.5
EvidenceMeasured1 public benchmark observation across 1 boardMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards
Input / 1M$0.12$0.15
Output / 1M$0.80$1.20
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context262K262K
Providers43
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Qwen3 Coder Next is #85; Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is #68 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 27.6 for Qwen3 Coder Next and 37.5 for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $0.80 for Qwen3 Coder Next and $1.20 for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking.
  • Published context is 262,144 tokens for Qwen3 Coder Next and 262,144 for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking.
  • ModelCap currently lists 4 providers for Qwen3 Coder Next and 3 for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.