Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B and Step 3.7 Flash, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs Step 3.7 Flash

Live dataset updated 8/18/2026, 3:36:20 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B and Step 3.7 Flash
Field
ModelCap position#62#66
Index score42.239.6
EvidenceMeasured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boardsMeasured1 public benchmark observation across 1 board
Input / 1M$0.30$0.20
Output / 1M$1.00$1.15
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context262K262K
Providers53
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B is #62; Step 3.7 Flash is #66 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 42.2 for Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B and 39.6 for Step 3.7 Flash.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $1.00 for Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B and $1.15 for Step 3.7 Flash.
  • Published context is 262,144 tokens for Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B and 262,144 for Step 3.7 Flash.
  • ModelCap currently lists 5 providers for Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B and 3 for Step 3.7 Flash.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.