Model decision surface
Compare AI models
Start with Qwen3.8 Max (0902) and MiMo-V2.6-Flash, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.
Current public data
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Live dataset updated 9/22/2026, 10:37:09 PM UTC
Open 1200×630 evidence receipt| Field | MiMo-V2.6-Flash Xiaomi | |
|---|---|---|
| ModelCap position | #6 | #10 |
| Index score | 87.2 | 84.4 |
| Evidence | Measured1 public benchmark observation across 1 board | Estimatedpublisher-corpus-prior over 209 held-out anchors (8%); launch card against 5 resolved peers on 7 rows (92%); exceeds every named peer on 1 of 7 rows; no cross-lab optimism probe available; shrunk 0.7 toward the measured corpus |
| Input / 1M | $2.00 | $0.14 |
| Output / 1M | $6.00 | $0.28 |
| Pricing status | fresh | fresh |
| Context | 1M | 1M |
| Providers | 1 | 2 |
| Weight access | API only | Open weights |
Decision facts
- Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is #6; MiMo-V2.6-Flash is #10 on the same current language board.
- Index scores are 87.2 for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) and 84.4 for MiMo-V2.6-Flash. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
- Evidence differs: Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is Measured; MiMo-V2.6-Flash is Estimated.
- Listed output price per 1M tokens is $6.00 for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) and $0.28 for MiMo-V2.6-Flash. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $7.00 for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) versus $0.42 for MiMo-V2.6-Flash. MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs 94.0% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.
- Published context is 1,000,000 tokens for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) and 1,048,576 for MiMo-V2.6-Flash.
- Weight access differs: Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is none; MiMo-V2.6-Flash is open.
- ModelCap currently lists 1 providers for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) and 2 for MiMo-V2.6-Flash.
These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.
Popular comparisons
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol#1 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5.5#3 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Sol#3 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Grok 4.7#1 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Sol vs Grok 4.7#2 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Grok 4.7#3 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#1 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Sol vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#2 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#3 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Grok 4.7 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#4 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#1 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#2 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#3 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Grok 4.7#6 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#6 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra#1 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs GPT-6 Sol#7 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra#3 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs Grok 4.7#7 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#7 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#7 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3#1 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6 Sol#8 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3#3 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.