Model decision surface
Compare AI models
Start with Qwen3.8 Max (0902) and Qwen3 Coder Next, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.
Current public data
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Live dataset updated 9/9/2026, 9:50:24 PM UTC
Open 1200×630 evidence receipt| Field | Qwen3 Coder Next Qwen | |
|---|---|---|
| ModelCap position | #32 | #103 |
| Index score | 67.5 | 40.2 |
| Evidence | Estimatedpublisher-corpus-prior over 180 held-out anchors (22%); opens from measured predecessor qwen/qwen3.7-max (78%); shrunk 4.7 toward the measured corpus | Measured1 public benchmark observation across 1 board |
| Input / 1M | $2.00 | $0.12 |
| Output / 1M | $6.00 | $0.80 |
| Pricing status | fresh | fresh |
| Context | 1M | 262K |
| Providers | 1 | 4 |
| Weight access | API only | Open weights |
Decision facts
- Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is #32; Qwen3 Coder Next is #103 on the same current language board.
- Index scores are 67.5 for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) and 40.2 for Qwen3 Coder Next. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
- Evidence differs: Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is Estimated; Qwen3 Coder Next is Measured.
- Listed output price per 1M tokens is $6.00 for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) and $0.80 for Qwen3 Coder Next. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $7.00 for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) versus $0.64 for Qwen3 Coder Next. Qwen3 Coder Next costs 90.9% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.
- Published context is 1,000,000 tokens for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) and 262,144 for Qwen3 Coder Next.
- Weight access differs: Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is none; Qwen3 Coder Next is open.
- ModelCap currently lists 1 providers for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) and 4 for Qwen3 Coder Next.
These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.
Popular comparisons
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6 Astra#2 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra#3 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3#3 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-6 Astra#4 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Muse Spark 1.3#4 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5#3 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs Grok 4.6#1 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs Grok 4.6#2 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Grok 4.6#3 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Grok 4.6#4 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-6 Astra#6 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#2 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#3 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#4 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs Grok 4.6#6 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Kimi K3 vs GPT-6 Astra#7 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs Kimi K3#2 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3#3 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Kimi K3#4 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Kimi K3 vs Grok 4.6#7 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#7 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra#8 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3#8 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#3 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.