Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Qwen3.8 Max and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Qwen3.8 Max vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Live dataset updated 8/17/2026, 11:13:20 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Qwen3.8 Max and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
Field
ModelCap position#5#100
Index score80.523.7
EvidenceMeasured4 public benchmark observations across 4 boardsEstimatedpublisher corpus prior · leave-one-anchor-out calibrated
Input / 1M$2.00$0.20
Output / 1M$6.00$2.40
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context1M262K
Providers12
Weight accessAPI onlyOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Qwen3.8 Max is #5; Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is #100 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 80.5 for Qwen3.8 Max and 23.7 for Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking.
  • Evidence differs: Qwen3.8 Max is Measured; Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is Estimated.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $6.00 for Qwen3.8 Max and $2.40 for Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking.
  • Published context is 1,000,000 tokens for Qwen3.8 Max and 262,144 for Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking.
  • Weight access differs: Qwen3.8 Max is none; Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is open.
  • ModelCap currently lists 1 providers for Qwen3.8 Max and 2 for Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.