Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Qwen3.8 Flash and Grok 4.6, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Qwen3.8 Flash vs Grok 4.6

Live dataset updated 9/3/2026, 3:06:08 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Qwen3.8 Flash and Grok 4.6
Field
ModelCap position#17#16
Index score72.173.2
EvidenceMeasured1 public benchmark observation across 1 boardMeasured6 public benchmark observations across 6 boards
Input / 1M$0.15$2.00
Output / 1M$0.47$6.00
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context1M500K
Providers12
Weight accessRestricted licenseAPI only

Decision facts

  • Qwen3.8 Flash is #17; Grok 4.6 is #16 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 72.1 for Qwen3.8 Flash and 73.2 for Grok 4.6.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $0.47 for Qwen3.8 Flash and $6.00 for Grok 4.6.
  • Published context is 1,000,000 tokens for Qwen3.8 Flash and 500,000 for Grok 4.6.
  • Weight access differs: Qwen3.8 Flash is restricted; Grok 4.6 is none.
  • ModelCap currently lists 1 providers for Qwen3.8 Flash and 2 for Grok 4.6.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.