Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Qwen3.7 Flash and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Qwen3.7 Flash vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking

Live dataset updated 8/17/2026, 11:13:20 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Qwen3.7 Flash and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Field
ModelCap position#102#68
Index score23.737.5
EvidenceEstimatedpublisher corpus prior · leave-one-anchor-out calibratedMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards
Input / 1M$0.03$0.15
Output / 1M$0.13$1.20
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context1M262K
Providers13
Weight accessAPI onlyOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Qwen3.7 Flash is #102; Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is #68 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 23.7 for Qwen3.7 Flash and 37.5 for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking.
  • Evidence differs: Qwen3.7 Flash is Estimated; Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is Measured.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $0.13 for Qwen3.7 Flash and $1.20 for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking.
  • Published context is 1,000,000 tokens for Qwen3.7 Flash and 262,144 for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking.
  • Weight access differs: Qwen3.7 Flash is none; Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is open.
  • ModelCap currently lists 1 providers for Qwen3.7 Flash and 3 for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.