Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Qwen3.6 35B A3B and UI Mate democua 27B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs UI Mate democua 27B

Live dataset updated 9/9/2026, 9:50:24 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Qwen3.6 35B A3B and UI Mate democua 27B
Field
ModelCap position#78#66
Index score49.654.0
EvidenceEstimatedpublisher-corpus-prior over 180 held-out anchors (22%); opens from measured predecessor qwen/qwen3.5-35b-a3b (78%); shrunk 0.4 up toward the measured corpusInheritedfinetune of qwen/qwen3.6-27b · finetune (100%)
Input / 1M$0.10Unavailable
Output / 1M$0.90Unavailable
Pricing statusfreshunavailable
Context262K—
Providers100
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Qwen3.6 35B A3B is #78; UI Mate democua 27B is #66 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 49.6 for Qwen3.6 35B A3B and 54.0 for UI Mate democua 27B. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
  • Evidence differs: Qwen3.6 35B A3B is Estimated; UI Mate democua 27B is Inherited.
  • ModelCap currently lists 10 providers for Qwen3.6 35B A3B and 0 for UI Mate democua 27B.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.