Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Qwen3.8 Flash, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Qwen3.8 Flash

Live dataset updated 9/3/2026, 5:19:04 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Qwen3.8 Flash
Field
ModelCap position#28#17
Index score62.572.1
EvidenceMeasured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boardsMeasured1 public benchmark observation across 1 board
Input / 1M$0.55$0.15
Output / 1M$3.50$0.47
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context262K1M
Providers101
Weight accessOpen weightsRestricted license

Decision facts

  • Qwen3.5 397B A17B is #28; Qwen3.8 Flash is #17 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 62.5 for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and 72.1 for Qwen3.8 Flash.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $3.50 for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and $0.47 for Qwen3.8 Flash.
  • Published context is 262,144 tokens for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and 1,000,000 for Qwen3.8 Flash.
  • Weight access differs: Qwen3.5 397B A17B is open; Qwen3.8 Flash is restricted.
  • ModelCap currently lists 10 providers for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and 1 for Qwen3.8 Flash.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.