Model decision surface
Compare AI models
Start with Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902), or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.
Current public data
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Live dataset updated 9/9/2026, 9:50:24 PM UTC
Open 1200×630 evidence receipt| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| ModelCap position | #88 | #32 |
| Index score | 45.3 | 67.5 |
| Evidence | Measured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards | Estimatedpublisher-corpus-prior over 180 held-out anchors (22%); opens from measured predecessor qwen/qwen3.7-max (78%); shrunk 4.7 toward the measured corpus |
| Input / 1M | $0.048 | $2.00 |
| Output / 1M | $0.193 | $6.00 |
| Pricing status | fresh | fresh |
| Context | 262K | 1M |
| Providers | 4 | 1 |
| Weight access | Open weights | API only |
Decision facts
- Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 is #88; Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is #32 on the same current language board.
- Index scores are 45.3 for Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and 67.5 for Qwen3.8 Max (0902). Their published uncertainty intervals do not overlap, but the aggregate Index does not predict performance on every task; compare the relevant benchmark configurations before choosing.
- Evidence differs: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 is Measured; Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is Estimated.
- Listed output price per 1M tokens is $0.19 for Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and $6.00 for Qwen3.8 Max (0902). For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $0.19 for Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 versus $7.00 for Qwen3.8 Max (0902). Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs 97.2% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.
- Published context is 262,144 tokens for Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and 1,000,000 for Qwen3.8 Max (0902).
- Weight access differs: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 is open; Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is none.
- ModelCap currently lists 4 providers for Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and 1 for Qwen3.8 Max (0902).
These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.
Popular comparisons
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6 Astra#2 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra#3 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3#3 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-6 Astra#4 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Muse Spark 1.3#4 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5#3 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs Grok 4.6#1 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs Grok 4.6#2 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Grok 4.6#3 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Grok 4.6#4 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-6 Astra#6 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#2 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#3 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#4 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs Grok 4.6#6 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Kimi K3 vs GPT-6 Astra#7 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs Kimi K3#2 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3#3 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Kimi K3#4 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Kimi K3 vs Grok 4.6#7 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#7 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra#8 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3#8 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#3 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.