Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Qwen3 30B A3B and Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Qwen3 30B A3B vs Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507

Live dataset updated 8/18/2026, 3:36:20 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Qwen3 30B A3B and Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507
Field
ModelCap position#95#105
Index score24.523.5
EvidenceMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boardsEstimatedstart rank interpolated from the launch card's own comparison table against resolved catalogue peers, discounted for measured cross-lab optimism
Input / 1M$0.13Unavailable
Output / 1M$0.52Unavailable
Pricing statusfreshunavailable
Context131K262K
Providers20
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Qwen3 30B A3B is #95; Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507 is #105 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 24.5 for Qwen3 30B A3B and 23.5 for Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507.
  • Evidence differs: Qwen3 30B A3B is Measured; Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507 is Estimated.
  • Published context is 131,072 tokens for Qwen3 30B A3B and 262,144 for Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507.
  • ModelCap currently lists 2 providers for Qwen3 30B A3B and 0 for Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.