Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 and GLM 5 Turbo, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 vs GLM 5 Turbo

Live dataset updated 8/18/2026, 3:36:20 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 and GLM 5 Turbo
Field
ModelCap position#49#39
Index score49.853.9
EvidenceMeasured4 public benchmark observations across 4 boardsMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards
Input / 1M$0.09$1.20
Output / 1M$0.55$4.00
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context262K203K
Providers91
Weight accessOpen weightsAPI only

Decision facts

  • Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 is #49; GLM 5 Turbo is #39 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 49.8 for Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 and 53.9 for GLM 5 Turbo.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $0.55 for Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 and $4.00 for GLM 5 Turbo.
  • Published context is 262,144 tokens for Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 and 202,752 for GLM 5 Turbo.
  • Weight access differs: Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 is open; GLM 5 Turbo is none.
  • ModelCap currently lists 9 providers for Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 and 1 for GLM 5 Turbo.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.