Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Qwen3 235B A22B and ContextPilot E4B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Qwen3 235B A22B vs ContextPilot E4B

Live dataset updated 9/3/2026, 3:28:37 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Qwen3 235B A22B and ContextPilot E4B
Field
ModelCap position#70#71
Index score39.638.9
EvidenceMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boardsEstimatedpublisher corpus prior · leave-one-anchor-out calibrated
Input / 1M$0.455Unavailable
Output / 1M$1.82Unavailable
Pricing statusfreshunavailable
Context131K—
Providers10
Weight accessOpen weightsRestricted license

Decision facts

  • Qwen3 235B A22B is #70; ContextPilot E4B is #71 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 39.6 for Qwen3 235B A22B and 38.9 for ContextPilot E4B.
  • Evidence differs: Qwen3 235B A22B is Measured; ContextPilot E4B is Estimated.
  • Weight access differs: Qwen3 235B A22B is open; ContextPilot E4B is restricted.
  • ModelCap currently lists 1 providers for Qwen3 235B A22B and 0 for ContextPilot E4B.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.