Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Qwen2.5 Coder 3B Instruct and Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Qwen2.5 Coder 3B Instruct vs Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507

Live dataset updated 8/17/2026, 11:13:20 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Qwen2.5 Coder 3B Instruct and Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507
Field
ModelCap position#95#103
Index score23.723.5
EvidenceEstimatedpublisher corpus prior · leave-one-anchor-out calibratedEstimatedstart rank interpolated from the launch card's own comparison table against resolved catalogue peers, discounted for measured cross-lab optimism
Input / 1MUnavailableUnavailable
Output / 1MUnavailableUnavailable
Pricing statusunavailableunavailable
Context33K262K
Providers00
Weight accessRestricted licenseOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Qwen2.5 Coder 3B Instruct is #95; Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507 is #103 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 23.7 for Qwen2.5 Coder 3B Instruct and 23.5 for Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507.
  • Both positions use Estimated evidence.
  • Published context is 32,768 tokens for Qwen2.5 Coder 3B Instruct and 262,144 for Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507.
  • Weight access differs: Qwen2.5 Coder 3B Instruct is restricted; Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507 is open.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.