Model decision surface
Compare AI models
Start with Laguna XS 2.1 and Qwen3.6 35B A3B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.
Current public data
Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Live dataset updated 9/12/2026, 1:09:54 PM UTC
Open 1200×630 evidence receipt| Field | Laguna XS 2.1 Poolside | Qwen3.6 35B A3B Qwen |
|---|---|---|
| ModelCap position | #79 | #82 |
| Index score | 51.3 | 50.7 |
| Evidence | Estimated3 reported rows against measured corpus ladders (32%); global-corpus-prior over 188 held-out anchors (69%); shrunk 3.4 up toward the measured corpus | Measured1 public benchmark observation across 1 board |
| Input / 1M | $0.06 | $0.10 |
| Output / 1M | $0.12 | $0.90 |
| Pricing status | fresh | fresh |
| Context | 262K | 262K |
| Providers | 1 | 11 |
| Weight access | Restricted license | Open weights |
Decision facts
- Laguna XS 2.1 is #79; Qwen3.6 35B A3B is #82 on the same current language board.
- Index scores are 51.3 for Laguna XS 2.1 and 50.7 for Qwen3.6 35B A3B. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
- Evidence differs: Laguna XS 2.1 is Estimated; Qwen3.6 35B A3B is Measured.
- Listed output price per 1M tokens is $0.12 for Laguna XS 2.1 and $0.90 for Qwen3.6 35B A3B. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $0.18 for Laguna XS 2.1 versus $0.65 for Qwen3.6 35B A3B. Laguna XS 2.1 costs 72.3% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.
- Published context is 262,144 tokens for Laguna XS 2.1 and 262,144 for Qwen3.6 35B A3B.
- Weight access differs: Laguna XS 2.1 is restricted; Qwen3.6 35B A3B is open.
- ModelCap currently lists 1 providers for Laguna XS 2.1 and 11 for Qwen3.6 35B A3B.
These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.
Popular comparisons
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3#1 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5#1 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Muse Spark 1.3#3 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra#1 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6 Astra#2 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-6 Astra#3 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#1 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#2 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#3 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-6 Astra#5 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GLM 5.3#1 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GLM 5.3#2 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GLM 5.3#3 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs GLM 5.3#4 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs GLM 5.3#5 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#1 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3#7 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#3 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra#7 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Sol#7 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GLM 5.3#7 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3#1 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs Kimi K3#2 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Kimi K3#3 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.