Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Laguna S 2.1 and Reka Flash 3, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Laguna S 2.1 vs Reka Flash 3

Live dataset updated 8/18/2026, 3:36:20 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Laguna S 2.1 and Reka Flash 3
Field
Laguna S 2.1

Poolside

ModelCap position#157#228
Index score21.40.0
EvidenceEstimatedglobal corpus prior · leave-one-anchor-out calibratedMeasured1 public benchmark observation across 1 board
Input / 1M$0.09$0.10
Output / 1M$0.18$0.20
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context1M66K
Providers11
Weight accessRestricted licenseOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Laguna S 2.1 is #157; Reka Flash 3 is #228 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 21.4 for Laguna S 2.1 and 0.0 for Reka Flash 3.
  • Evidence differs: Laguna S 2.1 is Estimated; Reka Flash 3 is Measured.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $0.18 for Laguna S 2.1 and $0.20 for Reka Flash 3.
  • Published context is 1,048,576 tokens for Laguna S 2.1 and 65,536 for Reka Flash 3.
  • Weight access differs: Laguna S 2.1 is restricted; Reka Flash 3 is open.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.