Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Laguna S 2.1 and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B

Live dataset updated 9/3/2026, 3:39:57 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Laguna S 2.1 and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Field
Laguna S 2.1

Poolside

ModelCap position#68#65
Index score40.341.3
EvidenceEstimatedplaced against measured peers on publisher-reported benchmarks, discounted for self-report optimismMeasured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards
Input / 1M$0.09$0.30
Output / 1M$0.18$1.00
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context1M262K
Providers15
Weight accessRestricted licenseOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Laguna S 2.1 is #68; Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B is #65 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 40.3 for Laguna S 2.1 and 41.3 for Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B.
  • Evidence differs: Laguna S 2.1 is Estimated; Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B is Measured.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $0.18 for Laguna S 2.1 and $1.00 for Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B.
  • Published context is 1,048,576 tokens for Laguna S 2.1 and 262,144 for Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B.
  • Weight access differs: Laguna S 2.1 is restricted; Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B is open.
  • ModelCap currently lists 1 providers for Laguna S 2.1 and 5 for Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.