Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with MiniCPM5 2B and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

MiniCPM5 2B vs Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct

Live dataset updated 9/22/2026, 10:37:09 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of MiniCPM5 2B and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
Field
ModelCap position#90#91
Index score55.254.8
EvidenceMeasured1 public benchmark observation across 1 boardEstimatedpublisher-corpus-prior over 209 held-out anchors (6%); launch card against 3 resolved peers on 4 rows (94%); no cross-lab optimism probe available; shrunk 0.1 up toward the measured corpus
Input / 1MUnavailable$0.07
Output / 1MUnavailable$0.28
Pricing statusunavailablefresh
Context—262K
Providers04
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights

Decision facts

  • MiniCPM5 2B is #90; Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct is #91 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 55.2 for MiniCPM5 2B and 54.8 for Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
  • Evidence differs: MiniCPM5 2B is Measured; Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct is Estimated.
  • ModelCap currently lists 0 providers for MiniCPM5 2B and 4 for Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.