Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with o4 Mini and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

o4 Mini vs Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507

Live dataset updated 8/17/2026, 11:13:20 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of o4 Mini and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Field
o4 Mini

OpenAI

ModelCap position#57#60
Index score43.542.5
EvidenceMeasured4 public benchmark observations across 4 boardsMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards
Input / 1M$1.10$0.048
Output / 1M$4.40$0.193
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context200K262K
Providers15
Weight accessAPI onlyOpen weights

Decision facts

  • o4 Mini is #57; Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 is #60 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 43.5 for o4 Mini and 42.5 for Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $4.40 for o4 Mini and $0.19 for Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507.
  • Published context is 200,000 tokens for o4 Mini and 262,144 for Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507.
  • Weight access differs: o4 Mini is none; Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 is open.
  • ModelCap currently lists 1 providers for o4 Mini and 5 for Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.