Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with o3 Pro and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

o3 Pro vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Live dataset updated 8/17/2026, 11:13:20 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of o3 Pro and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
Field
o3 Pro

OpenAI

ModelCap position#54#55
Index score46.546.3
EvidenceMeasured1 public benchmark observation across 1 boardMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards
Input / 1M$20.00$0.40
Output / 1M$80.00$4.00
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context200K131K
Providers12
Weight accessAPI onlyOpen weights

Decision facts

  • o3 Pro is #54; Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is #55 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 46.5 for o3 Pro and 46.3 for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $80.00 for o3 Pro and $4.00 for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking.
  • Published context is 200,000 tokens for o3 Pro and 131,072 for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking.
  • Weight access differs: o3 Pro is none; Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is open.
  • ModelCap currently lists 1 providers for o3 Pro and 2 for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.