Model decision surface
Compare AI models
Start with gpt-oss-safeguard-20b and o4 Mini, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.
Current public data
gpt-oss-safeguard-20b vs o4 Mini
Live dataset updated 9/22/2026, 9:31:46 PM UTC
Open 1200×630 evidence receipt| Field | gpt-oss-safeguard-20b OpenAI | o4 Mini OpenAI |
|---|---|---|
| ModelCap position | #169 | #106 |
| Index score | 31.3 | 51.6 |
| Evidence | Inheritedfinetune of openai/gpt-oss-20b · fp4 (100%) | Measured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards |
| Input / 1M | $0.075 | $1.10 |
| Output / 1M | $0.30 | $4.40 |
| Pricing status | fresh | fresh |
| Context | 131K | 200K |
| Providers | 1 | 1 |
| Weight access | Open weights | API only |
Decision facts
- gpt-oss-safeguard-20b is #169; o4 Mini is #106 on the same current language board.
- Index scores are 31.3 for gpt-oss-safeguard-20b and 51.6 for o4 Mini. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
- Evidence differs: gpt-oss-safeguard-20b is Inherited; o4 Mini is Measured.
- Listed output price per 1M tokens is $0.30 for gpt-oss-safeguard-20b and $4.40 for o4 Mini. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $0.30 for gpt-oss-safeguard-20b versus $4.40 for o4 Mini. gpt-oss-safeguard-20b costs 93.2% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.
- Published context is 131,072 tokens for gpt-oss-safeguard-20b and 200,000 for o4 Mini.
- Weight access differs: gpt-oss-safeguard-20b is open; o4 Mini is none.
These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.
Popular comparisons
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol#1 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5.5#3 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Sol#3 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Grok 4.7#1 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Sol vs Grok 4.7#2 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Grok 4.7#3 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#1 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Sol vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#2 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#3 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Grok 4.7 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#4 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#1 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#2 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#3 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Grok 4.7#6 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#6 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra#1 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs GPT-6 Sol#7 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra#3 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs Grok 4.7#7 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#7 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#7 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3#1 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6 Sol#8 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3#3 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.