Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with gpt-oss-120b and Qwen Drive 1.0 4B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen Drive 1.0 4B

Live dataset updated 9/9/2026, 9:50:24 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of gpt-oss-120b and Qwen Drive 1.0 4B
Field
ModelCap position#110#108
Index score36.838.3
EvidenceMeasured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boardsInheritedfinetune of Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B · finetune (100%)
Input / 1M$0.037Unavailable
Output / 1M$0.17Unavailable
Pricing statusfreshunavailable
Context131K
Providers180
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights

Decision facts

  • gpt-oss-120b is #110; Qwen Drive 1.0 4B is #108 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 36.8 for gpt-oss-120b and 38.3 for Qwen Drive 1.0 4B. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
  • Evidence differs: gpt-oss-120b is Measured; Qwen Drive 1.0 4B is Inherited.
  • ModelCap currently lists 18 providers for gpt-oss-120b and 0 for Qwen Drive 1.0 4B.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.