Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Hy-MT2-1.8B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini vs Hy-MT2-1.8B

Live dataset updated 9/3/2026, 3:39:57 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Hy-MT2-1.8B
Field
ModelCap position#69#72
Index score40.238.9
EvidenceMeasured1 public benchmark observation across 1 boardEstimatedpublisher corpus prior · leave-one-anchor-out calibrated
Input / 1M$0.25$0.044
Output / 1M$2.00$0.177
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context400K8K
Providers11
Weight accessAPI onlyOpen weights

Decision facts

  • GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini is #69; Hy-MT2-1.8B is #72 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 40.2 for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and 38.9 for Hy-MT2-1.8B.
  • Evidence differs: GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini is Measured; Hy-MT2-1.8B is Estimated.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $2.00 for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and $0.18 for Hy-MT2-1.8B.
  • Published context is 400,000 tokens for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and 8,192 for Hy-MT2-1.8B.
  • Weight access differs: GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini is none; Hy-MT2-1.8B is open.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.