Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Laguna S 2.1, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini vs Laguna S 2.1

Live dataset updated 9/3/2026, 3:17:25 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Laguna S 2.1
Field
Laguna S 2.1

Poolside

ModelCap position#69#68
Index score40.240.3
EvidenceMeasured1 public benchmark observation across 1 boardEstimatedplaced against measured peers on publisher-reported benchmarks, discounted for self-report optimism
Input / 1M$0.25$0.09
Output / 1M$2.00$0.18
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context400K1M
Providers11
Weight accessAPI onlyRestricted license

Decision facts

  • GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini is #69; Laguna S 2.1 is #68 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 40.2 for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and 40.3 for Laguna S 2.1.
  • Evidence differs: GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini is Measured; Laguna S 2.1 is Estimated.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $2.00 for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and $0.18 for Laguna S 2.1.
  • Published context is 400,000 tokens for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and 1,048,576 for Laguna S 2.1.
  • Weight access differs: GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini is none; Laguna S 2.1 is restricted.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.